On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, David Miller wrote:
> From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@???>
> Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 00:39:35 -0400 (EDT)
>
>> The ABI is very vague about it. The V9 ABI just displays that 6-word space
>> in a figure bug doesn't say anything about it's usage. The V8 ABI just
>> says that "the function may write incoming arguments there". If it may
>> write anything other, it is unknown --- probably yes, but it is not said
>> in the document.
>>
>> The document nicely specifies who owns which registers, but doesn't say
>> that about the stack space :-(
>
> Actually, I know for a fact that you have to have those slots there.
>
> A long time ago in the sparc64 kernel, in the trap entry code, I tried
> only giving 128 bytes of stack frame as the trap entry called into C
> code. And it did not work, I had to put the 6 slots there.
The bad thing is that gcc can't use those slots optimally. If you have for
example:
void f(int *x)
{
}
void g()
{
int a;
f(&a);
}
void h()
{
g();
}
Then the variable "a" can't be placed into one of the 6 implicit slots for
g->f call (beacuse "f" may overwrite that slot). But "a" could be placed
into one of those 6 slots that "h" allocates for "g" (because these slots
are owned by "g"). But it isn't --- additional place is allocated for "a"
:-/
Mikulas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@???
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
