Re: RFC: Adding non-PIC executable support to MIPS

Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@???> writes:
> I've been thinking about that a lot recently, since I heard about
> your implementation. I kind-of guessed it had been agreed with MTI
> beforehand (although I hadn't realised MTI themselves had written
> the specification). Having thought it over, I think it would be best
> if I stand down as a MIPS maintainer and if someone with the appropriate
> commercial connections is appointed instead. I'd recommend any
> combination of yourself, Adam Nemet and David Daney (subject to
> said people being willing, of course).

I realised afterwards that this might be offensive by who it left out.
For the record, it wasn't supposed to be an exclusive list. Other people
have strong claims too. ;)

Richard