Re: [Gimp-web] Gimp-web Digest, Vol 43, Issue 15

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Guillermo Espertino
Date:  
To: gimp-web
Subject: Re: [Gimp-web] Gimp-web Digest, Vol 43, Issue 15
Maybe you should use versions as "tags" and no just one specific
category per item.
I mean, if a plugin is compatible with 2.0, 2.2 and 2.4 tag it with
those versions.
If it's 2.2 only and won't work in 2.4, tag it as 2.2 only and so on.
That way will allow to filter 2.2 that won't work in 2.4 and similar
situations.

Regards,
Gez.

gimp-web-request@??? escribió:
> Send Gimp-web mailing list submissions to
>     gimp-web@???
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>     https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-web
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>     gimp-web-request@???
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>     gimp-web-owner@???
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Gimp-web digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. version issues ( Ingo L?tkebohle )
> 2. Re: version issues (Sven Neumann)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 11:49:04 +0100
> From: " Ingo L?tkebohle " <iluetkeb@???>
> Subject: [Gimp-web] version issues
> To: "GIMP Web" <gimp-web@???>
> Message-ID:
>     <fdd727f80710280349h1e90f33byec8cb6626a5376fd@???>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hi,
>
> regarding the recent discussion on required GIMP versions, I just had
> a registry user request a 2.4 category specifically because some 2.2
> plugins would not work with 2.4 and he had to patch them.
>
> This contradicts how I understood Svens mail (i.e. that all 2.x series
> plugins work with 2.4 unchanged). Did I misunderstood what Sven said,
> or is this is a case of where all "well written" plugins should work
> but some don't?
>
> So, what should we about that? I have now added both a "2.4" and a
> "2.x" category to the registry, the latter for cases known to work and
> the former for special cases.
>
> btw, I have asked the person in question to post to the
> gimp-developers list, outlining what had to be done, so maybe this
> will get fixed.
>
> cheers,
>
>

_______________________________________________
Gimp-web mailing list
Gimp-web@???
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-web