2007/10/19, Raphaël Quinet <raphael@???>:
> Yes, that would be nice. There could be a limit on the number and size
> of images included to describe the plug-in. If we want to ensure that
> these images are not too distracting so that it is still possible to
> browse a list of plug-ins easily without having to skip over large
> images, then we could have a rather strict limit of just one small
> thumbnail-sized image for each plug-in. For example, one image that
> would be less than 150x100 so that it could be displayed inline on the
> right side of the plug-in description. That image could link to a
> version of the same image in higher resolution.
We can do this in several different ways. One idea would be "Albums",
where pictures would be added. The album module already has support
for grid and list views, thumbnailing, and so on. It is also pretty
easy to link to an album image from the description of the plugin (the
album provides a filter so that [acidfree:imgnumber] gets turned into
a thumbnail.
> I agree. Using a consistent style for the description of all plug-ins
> and scripts will help users to find what they are looking for. And the
> site will look better.
One thing we could do is introduce particular fields that can be
edited separately and will be layed out consistently. Is that what
you're looking for?
cheers
--
Dipl.-Inform. Ingo Lütkebohle
Faculty of Technology
Bielefeld University
http://www.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/~iluetkeb/
Fingerprint 3187 4DEC 47E6 1B1E 6F4F 57D4 CD90 C164 34AD CE5B
_______________________________________________
Gimp-web mailing list
Gimp-web@???
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-web
