On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 10:48 +0200, Roman Joost wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I spend some time on the imagebox the last days and tried lightbox. I do
> have now a working website with lightbox and scaling support. The
> scaling is done entirely in CSS which puts the lightbox approach in a
> much better position than the jQuery thingy.
>
> Is there anything which would prevent us switching to lightbox now?
> I can checkin my current approach with lightbox in a branch or just
> replace the imagebox with the lightbox 'imagebox'.
>
> PS: One glitch, which I hope could be fixed, is the not working scaling
> in IE6. I used 'max-width' for CSS which isn't supported by IE6.
> I think, this could be fixed with a IE only stylesheet using 'width'
> attributes.
>
> Interested in feedback now :)
Well now all you need to do is port all the jquery implemented stuff in
prototype :( Rounding of the corners, downloads page and the splash
gallery.
I was really hoping you would stick with imagebox. If you don't have the
time for that, I'd revert the safari2 fix and let safari2 users have a
plain html version for the splashes, rather then messing with the
ugliness of imagebox.js.
cheers
--
Jakub Steiner <jimmac@???>
_______________________________________________
Gimp-web mailing list
Gimp-web@???
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-web
