Re: [boost] [intrusive] Intrusive containers library strikes…

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Bruno Martínez
Date:  
To: boost
Subject: Re: [boost] [intrusive] Intrusive containers library strikes back
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 04:12:03 -0300, Ion Gaztañaga <igaztanaga@???>
wrote:

> If someone needs/wants more features, now's the time to request them!


I think intrusive containers would be useful. There was a separate
initiative that added intrusiveness to the multi index library. I think
it would be better to fold the many STL remakes that are popping up
(pointer containers, intrusive containers/shared mem containers) into
multi index than repeat the effort everywhere. Case in point: what do I
do if I need a pointer-sharedmem-bimap?

Bruno

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost