On 7/12/06, Peter Beckman <beckman@???> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
> > I agree, but A:TFoT is already there, so why repeat that? I guess our
> > goal was to produce an Asterisk library, so since we have the first book
> > (and it's audience covered), why not move on to the next thing.
>
> Because (a) it's not in a web-friendly format, (b) it's searchable only
> within Acrobat, (c) Google doesn' index it, (d) there is no Table of
> Contents.
>
> I think the content is great, but accessability and organization is
> needed.
This is easily resolved once I get the "code" from O'Reilly and create
a page much like the subversion book.
Don't worry, it's in the works... just need to find the TIME
Leif.
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-doc mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-doc
