Author: Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Newbies Discussion List Date: To: Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Newbies Discussion List Subject: Re: [plug-newbies] Re: Network Operating System
On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 16:22 +0800, fooler wrote: > ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Zak B. Elep" <zakame@???>
> To: "Philippine Linux Users' Group Newbie Mailing List"
> Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 4:08 PM
> Subject: [plug-newbies] Re: Network Operating System
> > So how come I'm getting the feeling that this is going nowhere?
> me too... and i dont understand why someone is trying to complicate things
> and dont accept that linux is a clone of unix...
Because I don't accept anything just because someone else says it. :D It
defies logic -- a clone is an exact copy of something else. And I refuse
to accept something that's really not logical.
> if fact the documenter of linux since from the first version upto the latest
> version says from its README that:
And so it must be wrong from the first version of the README up to now.
> WHAT IS LINUX?
> Linux is a Unix clone written from scratch by Linus Torvalds with
> assistance from a loosely-knit team of hackers across the Net.
> It aims towards POSIX compliance.
> it always changes the kernel version number for every kernel release from
> the first line of its README file but not the statement above...
So you go ahead and believe that Linux is a Unix clone, and that I am a
clone of you because we're both stubborn and would refuse to see each
other's argument. ;)