Re: [plug-newbies] Re: Network Operating System

Top Page
Author: Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Newbies Discussion List
To: Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Newbies Discussion List
Subject: Re: [plug-newbies] Re: Network Operating System
On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 16:22 +0800, fooler wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Zak B. Elep" <zakame@???>
> To: "Philippine Linux Users' Group Newbie Mailing List"
> <plug-newbies@???>
> Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 4:08 PM
> Subject: [plug-newbies] Re: Network Operating System
> > So how come I'm getting the feeling that this is going nowhere?
> me too... and i dont understand why someone is trying to complicate things
> and dont accept that linux is a clone of unix...

Because I don't accept anything just because someone else says it. :D It
defies logic -- a clone is an exact copy of something else. And I refuse
to accept something that's really not logical.

> if fact the documenter of linux since from the first version upto the latest
> version says from its README that:

And so it must be wrong from the first version of the README up to now.

> Linux is a Unix clone written from scratch by Linus Torvalds with
> assistance from a loosely-knit team of hackers across the Net.
> It aims towards POSIX compliance.
> it always changes the kernel version number for every kernel release from
> the first line of its README file but not the statement above...

So you go ahead and believe that Linux is a Unix clone, and that I am a
clone of you because we're both stubborn and would refuse to see each
other's argument. ;)

> fooler.


Dean Michael C. Berris <mikhailberis@???>
GPG Key: 0x08AE6EAC
Mobile: +63 921 7841815

Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Newbie Mailing List
plug-newbies@??? (#PLUG @
Read the Guidelines:
Searchable Archives: