Author: Mhac Janapin Date: To: Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Newbies Discussion List Subject: Re: [plug-newbies] Re: Network Operating System
Is not *clone* a "one-to-one" copy? As in, CD cloning; or DNA cloning.
If Linux is a clone, then it wouldn't be any different from Unix.
On 6/10/05, fooler <fooler@???> wrote: > ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dean Michael Berris" <mikhailberis@???>
> To: "Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Newbies Discussion List"
> Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 7:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [plug-newbies] Re: Network Operating System
> > (To clear things, Linux has no affiliation whatsoever with ANY of the
> > UNIX distributions out there. UNIX and Linux are completely different
> > animals, and calling one a clone of another would be incorrect -- even
> > if the README file says so.)
> i dont see any good point of yours why you made so complex that linux is a
> not a clone of unix... once you *imitate* something is called a clone...
> thats the simplest definition of a *clone*... linux is an imitation of
> unix.. and therefore linux is a clone of unix...
> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Newbie Mailing List
> plug-newbies@??? (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
> Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists > Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph >
I'm an Open Source Enthusiast. c",)
Mozilla Firefox 1 - getfirefox.com
Mozilla Thunderbird 1 - mozilla.org
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Newbie Mailing List
plug-newbies@??? (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
This message was posted to the following mailing lists: