your topology is just fine... fix your routing table at routerA, routerB and
FW...
fooler.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bong Fadriquela" <cybong@???>
To: <ph-networkers@???>
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 8:52 PM
Subject: [ph-networkers] Need help on Cisco 1751 V Router..
> Helo all,
>
> We're using an E1 line from pldt to connect our offices in two separate
> buildings. We got this setup, for our second office to join our main
office
> lan as well as PBX:
> ISP
> |X.X.X.Y
> |
> Leased Line |
> 10.10.10.0/30 |X.X.X.X
> Router-B Router-A FW | |
> (X)----------/\/-----------(X) [X]---------------| DMZ
> | | |192.168.1.1 |
> 192.168.2.1 192.168.1.2 |
> | | |
> | | |
> ----------- ----------------------
> 192.168.2.0/24 192.168.1.0/24
>
> BUILDING B BUILDING A
>
> We simply want our network B to connect to network A and internet as well.
> However, Router-A can't ping a ws on the same subnet when the gw specified
on
> the ws is the FW's, and can't even get out to the internet.
>
> All ws in the 192.168.10.0 subnet can access the internet, but why is it
that
> the router--having its E0 interface on the same subnet--can get out the
> network's default gw where this is no rules blocking in the FW. What
confuses
> me most is, the router can't even ping a ws on the same subnet when that
WS's
> gw is 192.168.1.1.
>
> Should I try another topology or solution? Are their any caveats on a
Cisco
> 1751 V router?
>
> I'll appreciate any advise and thank you very much.
> _______________________________________________
> ph-networkers mailing list
> ph-networkers@???
> http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-networkers
>
_______________________________________________
ph-networkers mailing list
ph-networkers@???
http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-networkers
