Re: [plug] Report: Qualifying XFS vs ReiserFS claims

On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Federico Sevilla III wrote:
..
> Conclusion:
>
> Again we reject the hypothesis that ReiserFS is significantly faster than
> XFS in _reading_ a large file (~600MB).

I believe that even on mongo XFS is faster than ReiserFS on very large
files. But that's a special case. Most UNIX systems have zillions of small
files, and ReiserFS *is* much faster, particularly on metadata updates,
than XFS on this case.


--
Orlando Andico <orly@???>
Mosaic Communications, Inc.

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GE d(-) s: a-25 C++++ UBLSI++++$ P+++ L+++>++++ E- W++ N(+)
o K? w O-- M- !V PS(++) PE- Y PGP-- t(+)@ 5(+) X++@ R(+) tv@
b++ DI++ G e++@ h--(*) r% y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------